Users of the r-word, inhuman humans, expulsions, Chris Beha
Monday 10/12/26
People act so sententious, like they're these moral paragons, and then turn around and call their online "adversary" whom they're just as bad/stupid as--in ways more similar than either party is able to understand--the r-word. You are a horrible, likely irredeemable, person if you use that word or any moronic variation thereof. You're cruel, incapable-of-empathy, arrant, dead-inside, uneducated, trash. Imagine how that feels to a loving parent of a child with special needs who has to see that.
Little brings out the violent, full-force idiocy of the United States like posts related to vaccines, which is saying something. The comments reveal so much about the disaster state of humanity. It's especially ironic when you look at the people railing against such things in their illiterate psychobabble--such that a hammerhead shark looks to be better educated--in the name of health. They often appear as though they do nothing but sit in place and eat garbage all day long. But here come the loads to lecture on health and science, and would kick Louis Pasteur out of the way to do so, if they could manage what for them would be an extremely challenging athletic maneuver. Besides, why lift a leg when you can eat a bucket of legs from the Colonel?
Humans aren't human anymore. There are few human humans left. A man who must have had some kind of mental debilities went into a tiger enclosure and died. The tiger didn't do anything "wrong." People, being as simple as they now are, try to ascribe moral culpability to animals, like they make these ethical choices. But someone lost their life. Cue the bad, cruel, sub-sophomoric jokes from idiots. How do you get to be that stupid? That nasty? It wouldn't seem humanly possible. Then again, it isn't.
I see that AI art and I unfollow, block, am done. There's a farm I like in Ipswich. Unfortunately, it's now AI art post after AI art post from them. How much of a lazy, unthinking dog are you to throw that up? And you're a farm? Shouldn't inorganic garbage, whether we're talking produce or not, be anathema to you as a general philosophical life rule? This kind of thing is so of the gutter. So low class.
It tells me a lot about your character, your standards, whether you're about doing things right or cutting corners, your taste, your mind, your mindset, your respect or lack thereof for people and the world, the example you set, whether you're worth knowing in what the relevant form that is whether you're a person or a business. Tells me you have no problem making the world worse. Tells me you're tacky and undeserving of respect. Tells me you don't respect people who aren't lazy. Tells me you don't respect not being lazy. It tells me you're a loser.
And even if you are good at farming in this case, care about the environment, etc., it causes me to think you aren't and certainly not to give you the benefit of that doubt, because why would you just be a lazy corner-cutter in this one area but not in others? People who do things right in one area tend to do things right period. And the same goes with people who do things wrong.
There really isn't a political divide. What? That's crazy! It isn't. There's an educational divide. The primary difference between Democrats and Republicans is education. I'm not saying liberals are intelligent. I don't believe there are fifty intelligent people in the world at present. I'm not sure there are a dozen. Or five.
But with Republicans you are often talking a complete--and I mean total--lack of education. No knowledge whatsoever, even a limited, second hand, third hand, eighteenth hand knowledge. Also, because of their absence of any education, a categorical, violent rejection of and hatred for knowledge and learning. The driving away of not just any thoughts, but the ability to have one, even in theory. Then, the concomitant defiance--that stomping around, petulant obstinance of the stupidest of the stupid.
Trump has this. He sets a tone in that regard. Models easily imitated behavior for those who can't think, won't think, and hold it to be self-evident that they're better off never thinking. So what do they do? They tell themselves--and you--that they know. There's no need to think. They've cut out the middle man in those pea brains of theirs.
Everyone is mostly as bad as everyone else. That Republican says what they say, denying science, whatever they're denying, repeating, chanting, screaming, being crazy, cruel, and infantile, and the Democrat who touts themselves as the morally superior person is also so stupid, so lacking in self-awareness, that they turn around and call the Republican a "retard" as we were saying above.
They're similar in many ways, except if you asked a liberal, for instance, what humans expel, you have a better chance of them answering, "carbon dioxide," whereas most Republicans--and I don't think this is hyperbole--wouldn't know. I'm not celebrating the liberal here. Ask one when Pearl Harbor was, and chances are they'll have no clue if they even know what it was. How about the Civil War? When was that? The meaning of the word "ostensible." How about that it's not "should of"? We don't have to go very far before people, regardless of their party/affiliation, are equally clueless.
Look at all the morons--and I've encountered thousands of them firsthand--who go to Charlestown and believe the Bunker Hill Monument was erected during the night to fight a battle the next day in which the Colonists shot flaming arrows out of the ventilation slits on the one side at the British down below. It isn't one in a thousand people in that Monument who have any idea, who are even smart enough to figure out, that this obelisk they are presently climbing, which is a staircase and nothing else on the inside, isn't a fortress out of The Adventures of Robin Hood.
Liberal, conservative, high school education, grad school education. Doesn't matter. It feels like a miracle in there when some guy, once every couple months, in the ten years I've been running stairs in the Monument, answers his girlfriend or wife's question of, "So this isn't a fort and it's just a memorial?" with, "Just a memorial."
I could kiss that guy. That's how rare it is. Usually they're both talking about the fort and flaming arrows and the British charging up the stairs with their swords. I'm not being funny right now. They could have gone to Harvard. (These things come out in conversation. Attire. References, asides. Comportment.) They could have gone to Bunker Hill Community College. No college. Doesn't matter.
If you're one of the ten of us left, it's terrifying, isn't it? And if you aren't, you're thinking, "FUCK YOU!!!!!" But I don't know what you'd be doing here in that case. Took a wrong turn, maybe. Or hate reading. Either way, I'll add that it's never too late to repent, never too late to change. You can have a week left in this world and still change. You can get it closer to right. We can all be better tomorrow than today.
That's how uneducated conservatives usually are, though. Read anything pertaining to science from any of them, as with vaccines, which are somewhat back in the news, this being the season for flu shots, boosters, and what not. They come off like cave people who just watched lightning strike a tree and start a fire for the first time and can't believe it was real so they rage as this fulminating form of self-made distraction. As if to divert from their own inability to...understand. And their unwillingness to do anything, any damn thing at all, like looking something up and reading for thirty seconds, to try to.
They hate knowledge. They see it as their personal enemy. To the conservative, knowledge is like that family they've been feuding with going back ten generations on the other side of the creek. They don't have good reasons. They just know to hate. No questions asked. And that's how they live, as such. No questions asked. No thoughts thought. It's easier. Why try, for instance, to figure something out, when you can simply say it's God and cook some more meat, make a few bets, and watch ten hours of football? And God's God. So that's final.
You see everything this cuts out? They do a form of this with everything. When you have one big thing that explains however many other things under that umbrella, so to speak, you don't have to think about any of those other things. The one does all that work for you.
I'll let you in on a little secret. No one deploys more defense mechanisms than the stupid. Tied with them are the guilty. (So imagine like the stupid and the guilty; like Chris Beha.) Lashing out--over very little, or preemptively, or way out proportion--is a defense mechanism.
Do you think there are fifty Republicans in the country who have ever read, say, a work of literature? Are there twenty? I'm not talking James Panero. And I don't mean that book on WWII tanks that they were given one year for Christmas. What percentage of Republicans can write, a single time, not every time, mind you, a complete sentence with all the words spelled correctly? Are there 250 Republicans in the States who can do that? Again, just the once? A conservative judge. Okay. But a "regular" person?
Say they were made to write 500 sentences in some lab setting, like if aliens rounded up a bunch of them for experiments in how stupid the inhabitants of this world are. Would there be a single correct sentence all the way through? A single correct five-word sentence? I'm not talking a sentence worthy of Proust. I just mean you had a subject, a verb, you didn't capitalize random words or the ones you like best because you think it works that way and maybe, just maybe, though I know this would be asking far, far, far, far, far too much, you used a comma properly, and there wasn't a space between the last word and the closing punctuation.
Because I never see it. And I read a lot. I'm not talking about seeing such a thing in National Review. I mean regarding the volk.




Comments